From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2844 invoked from network); 12 Jun 2000 12:02:02 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 12 Jun 2000 12:02:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 9683 invoked by alias); 12 Jun 2000 12:01:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 11868 Received: (qmail 9662 invoked from network); 12 Jun 2000 12:01:39 -0000 From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <1000612115925.ZM8973@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2000 11:59:25 +0000 In-Reply-To: <0FW100LBJBAW1J@la-la.cambridgesiliconradio.com> Comments: In reply to Peter Stephenson "Re: `typeset -H' is a bit too thorough" (Jun 12, 10:20am) References: <0FW100LBJBAW1J@la-la.cambridgesiliconradio.com> X-Mailer: Z-Mail (5.0.0 30July97) To: Peter Stephenson , zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk (Zsh hackers list) Subject: Re: `typeset -H' is a bit too thorough MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Jun 12, 10:20am, Peter Stephenson wrote: } Subject: Re: `typeset -H' is a bit too thorough } } (Still not getting incoming mail here, unfortunately Which of your addresses is "here"? } +#define PRINT_INCLUDEVALUE (1<<4) } } /* flags for printing for the whence builtin */ } #define PRINT_WHENCE_CSH (1<<4) Is it really OK for those two to overlap? They haven't before ... -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com Zsh: http://www.zsh.org | PHPerl Project: http://phperl.sourceforge.net