Re: What happened to article 11864?

Re: What happened to article 11864?

[Sven Wischnowsky]

Bart Schaefer wrote:

> I got a Cc of it by private mail, but it never reached the archives and I
> never saw the original across the list.  (I believe what I got to be 11864
> because it arrived between 11863 and 11865 and both of those *are* in the
> archive; as a Cc, it of course had no X-Seq field.)
> 
> The message was from Alexandre and I thought it was for the bug that Sven
> just patched in 11875, but perhaps it was for a different one (and I didn't
> save a copy) of the message).

I wondered about this, too. Especially when I found it in the
ChangeLog. My 11864 is your `diff #'.

And I'd like to see that patch (and description, if any).

Bye
 Sven


--
Sven Wischnowsky                         wischnow@informatik.hu-berlin.de

Re: What happened to article 11864?

[Bart Schaefer]

On Jun 14,  8:17am, Sven Wischnowsky wrote:
} Subject: Re: What happened to article 11864?
}
} > The message was from Alexandre and I thought it was for the bug that Sven
} > just patched in 11875, but perhaps it was for a different one (and I didn't
} > save a copy) of the message).
} 
} And I'd like to see that patch (and description, if any).

The description was (paraphrased) "Sorry, this is my fault, shifting an
array from the wrong end."

You can see the diff in cvsweb on sourceforge:

http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/zsh/Src/Zle/complist.c.diff?r1=1.24&r2=1.25&cvsroot=zsh

-- 
Bart Schaefer                                 Brass Lantern Enterprises
http://www.well.com/user/barts              http://www.brasslantern.com

Zsh: http://www.zsh.org | PHPerl Project: http://phperl.sourceforge.net   

What happened to article 11864?

[Bart Schaefer]

I got a Cc of it by private mail, but it never reached the archives and I
never saw the original across the list.  (I believe what I got to be 11864
because it arrived between 11863 and 11865 and both of those *are* in the
archive; as a Cc, it of course had no X-Seq field.)

The message was from Alexandre and I thought it was for the bug that Sven
just patched in 11875, but perhaps it was for a different one (and I didn't
save a copy) of the message).

-- 
Bart Schaefer                                 Brass Lantern Enterprises
http://www.well.com/user/barts              http://www.brasslantern.com

Zsh: http://www.zsh.org | PHPerl Project: http://phperl.sourceforge.net