From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13125 invoked from network); 19 Jun 2000 16:14:02 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 19 Jun 2000 16:14:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 26844 invoked by alias); 19 Jun 2000 16:13:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 11993 Received: (qmail 26817 invoked from network); 19 Jun 2000 16:13:46 -0000 From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <1000619161312.ZM14000@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2000 16:13:12 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20000619102518.A32081@scowler.net> Comments: In reply to Clint Adams "build problem with new texi2html" (Jun 19, 10:25am) References: <20000619102518.A32081@scowler.net> X-Mailer: Z-Mail (5.0.0 30July97) To: Clint Adams , zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk Subject: Re: build problem with new texi2html MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Jun 19, 10:25am, Clint Adams wrote: } Subject: build problem with new texi2html } } Seems that -expandinfo : use @ifinfo sections, not @iftex } has changed to -expand [info,tex] : expand info/tex sections Yeah, we reported that to the makeinfo maintainers and they apologized and said it was supposed to have remained backwards-compatible. The variant without the space is going to return in a future patch release. I'm not sure what that means we should do about it; There's probably some kind of configure/make foo that could insert a space if one is needed. } did spew this: } } texi2html -expand info -split_chapter ./zsh.texi } *** Duplicate node found: Files } *** Duplicate node found: Description } *** Duplicate node found: Description } *** Duplicate node found: Description (etc.) Those are bogus warnings; they're duplicated subsection titles, not real texinfo nodes. I.e., they're only duplicates because of the way the HTML table-of-contents is created. Hmm, however, I've never seen the HTML generated by 1.62.1; perhaps it has changed from using generated numbers as the name= part of the anchors and is trying to use the actual section titles? That'd be a big improvement in some respects, but would introduces multiple anchors with the same name. -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com Zsh: http://www.zsh.org | PHPerl Project: http://phperl.sourceforge.net