From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20505 invoked from network); 24 Jun 2000 23:21:43 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 24 Jun 2000 23:21:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 5690 invoked by alias); 24 Jun 2000 23:21:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 12059 Received: (qmail 5682 invoked from network); 24 Jun 2000 23:21:35 -0000 From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <1000624232123.ZM16787@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2000 23:21:23 +0000 In-Reply-To: <1000624230022.ZM16742@candle.brasslantern.com> Comments: In reply to "Bart Schaefer" "Re: A couple completion glitches" (Jun 24, 11:00pm) References: <1000624230022.ZM16742@candle.brasslantern.com> X-Mailer: Z-Mail (5.0.0 30July97) To: Wayne Davison , Zsh Workers Subject: Re: A couple completion glitches MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Jun 24, 11:00pm, I wrote: } } Hmm; looks like there's a bug in `zstyle -T', though I have no idea how } that crept in. Look here: } } zagzig% zstyle -L } zstyle ':completion:*' completer _expand _complete } zstyle ':completion:*:expand:*' suffix yes } zagzig% zstyle -t :completion::expand::: suffix && echo suffix is set } suffix is set } zagzig% zstyle -T :completion::expand::: suffix && echo suffix not set } suffix not set } } It shouldn't be possible for them both to return true. Of course, I'm silly. It certainly should be possible for both to return true. I keep forgetting that the difference between -t and -T is how they treat the case of the style NOT being set, not how they treat it when it IS set. So in fact for the original question: } } % touch foo{1..3} } } % ls ~/foo* } } } } ...and nothing happens! You DO need to set the suffix style, but you need to set it to "false". Which, now that I think about it, sounds backwards to me. It means "do not make a special case of expansions that have a suffix" but it *seems* to mean "do not expand the suffix." Which is how I got confused about what _expand was testing with "zstyle -T" in the first place ... -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com Zsh: http://www.zsh.org | PHPerl Project: http://phperl.sourceforge.net