From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4717 invoked from network); 12 Jul 2000 15:15:00 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 12 Jul 2000 15:15:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 11320 invoked by alias); 12 Jul 2000 15:14:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 12234 Received: (qmail 11311 invoked from network); 12 Jul 2000 15:14:35 -0000 From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <1000712151429.ZM10119@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 15:14:28 +0000 In-Reply-To: <200007121029.MAA21938@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> Comments: In reply to Sven Wischnowsky "Re: Bug in ${(z)...} lexing, or what?" (Jul 12, 12:29pm) References: <200007121029.MAA21938@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> X-Mailer: Z-Mail (5.0.0 30July97) To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk Subject: Re: Bug in ${(z)...} lexing, or what? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Jul 12, 12:29pm, Sven Wischnowsky wrote: } Subject: Re: Bug in ${(z)...} lexing, or what? } } Bart Schaefer wrote: } } > This has me baffled. } } You have interactive_comments set, right? No, I *don't*, which contributed significantly to my confusion. } This should fix that (I haven't looked close enough to find out when } it did that and when it didn't). This seems to have fixed it whether or not interactive_comments is set; does at least one of us understand why? -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com Zsh: http://www.zsh.org | PHPerl Project: http://phperl.sourceforge.net