From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16774 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2000 17:22:19 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 27 Jul 2000 17:22:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 8062 invoked by alias); 27 Jul 2000 17:22:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 12413 Received: (qmail 8052 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2000 17:22:07 -0000 From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <1000727172203.ZM8732@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 17:22:03 +0000 In-Reply-To: <1000727065708.ZM26483@candle.brasslantern.com> Comments: In reply to "Bart Schaefer" "PATCH (?): Re: wait for non-child PID" (Jul 27, 6:57am) References: <20000726190953.A22895@scowler.net> <1000727065708.ZM26483@candle.brasslantern.com> X-Mailer: Z-Mail (5.0.0 30July97) To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk Subject: Re: PATCH (?): Re: wait for non-child PID MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Jul 27, 6:57am, Bart Schaefer wrote: } } Short of doing that, the only thing to do seems to be to rely on the job } table. I won't commit the following patch until we're reasonably sure } that there are no interesting cases of child processes that can't be } detected by findproc() -- something I'm not entirely certain of myself. Anybody have anything to say about this? If nobody knows the answer, then maybe instead I should commit it and we can watch for things that break. -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com Zsh: http://www.zsh.org | PHPerl Project: http://phperl.sourceforge.net