From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6493 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2000 17:21:50 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 5 Oct 2000 17:21:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 23976 invoked by alias); 5 Oct 2000 17:21:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 12906 Received: (qmail 23951 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2000 17:21:30 -0000 From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <1001005171152.ZM24006@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 17:11:52 +0000 In-Reply-To: <002901c02ee1$c41a6f80$21c9ca95@mow.siemens.ru> Comments: In reply to "Andrej Borsenkow" "RE: PATCH: _expand, _expand_word, and their doc" (Oct 5, 7:34pm) References: <002901c02ee1$c41a6f80$21c9ca95@mow.siemens.ru> X-Mailer: Z-Mail (5.0.0 30July97) To: "Andrej Borsenkow" , Subject: Re: PATCH: _expand, _expand_word, and their doc MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Oct 5, 7:34pm, Andrej Borsenkow wrote: } } > What would you (or anyone else) think of removing insert-all-completions } > from _expand entirely (thus eliminating the -c option) and instead put } > compstate[insert]=all at the end of _expand_word (after _main_complete)? } } What has inserting all *completions* to do with *expansions* (and thus } _expand_word)? You're starting from an initial pattern and expanding it into a set of strings, aren't you? What difference does it make whether the way you got those strings was by globbing, parameter substitution, history, or by invoking the completion system, or anything else? -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com Zsh: http://www.zsh.org | PHPerl Project: http://phperl.sourceforge.net