From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 659 invoked from network); 11 Oct 2000 14:56:27 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 11 Oct 2000 14:56:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 19403 invoked by alias); 11 Oct 2000 14:55:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 12966 Received: (qmail 19388 invoked from network); 11 Oct 2000 14:55:49 -0000 From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <1001011145545.ZM3351@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 14:55:45 +0000 In-Reply-To: <200010110740.JAA26017@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> Comments: In reply to Sven Wischnowsky "rename fake style?" (Oct 11, 9:40am) References: <200010110740.JAA26017@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> X-Mailer: Z-Mail (5.0.0 30July97) To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk Subject: Re: rename fake style? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Oct 11, 9:40am, Sven Wischnowsky wrote: } } I already asked if we should (and still can) rename the fake style to } fake-files, so this is mainly to ensure that I don't accidentally } delete or overwrite the patch... I think that's a fine idea, but is this hunk really right? } @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ } disable-stat c:bool } domains c: } expand c: } - fake c:fake } + fake c:fake-files } fake-parameters c:fake-params } file-patterns c:filepat } file-sort c:fsort -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com Zsh: http://www.zsh.org | PHPerl Project: http://phperl.sourceforge.net