From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11228 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2000 03:11:19 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 26 Oct 2000 03:11:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 10300 invoked by alias); 26 Oct 2000 03:11:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 13085 Received: (qmail 10293 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2000 03:11:12 -0000 From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <1001026031101.ZM13476@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 03:11:00 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20001025173955.B9234@vin.ens-lyon.fr> Comments: In reply to Vincent Lefevre "Re: [bug?] named directory tex and compinit" (Oct 25, 5:39pm) References: <20001025150301.A7965@vin.ens-lyon.fr> <1001025145250.ZM13195@candle.brasslantern.com> <20001025173955.B9234@vin.ens-lyon.fr> X-Mailer: Z-Mail (5.0.0 30July97) To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk, Vincent Lefevre Subject: Re: [bug?] named directory tex and compinit MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii [Redirected from -users to -workers.] On Oct 25, 5:39pm, Vincent Lefevre wrote: } } The named directory disappears just after the _comps assignation } in the .zcompdump file. And if I replace the "tex _tex" line by } "ttex _tex", the named directory tex doesn't disappear. This indicates a pretty serious problem somewhere, as it would appear that hash table entries from two entirely independent hash tables are interfereing with each other. Is this the same OSF1 system where you're having ttyctl problems? I would almost suspect some kind of memory alignment issue. -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com Zsh: http://www.zsh.org | PHPerl Project: http://phperl.sourceforge.net