From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13850 invoked by alias); 4 Feb 2010 17:46:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 27662 Received: (qmail 13396 invoked from network); 4 Feb 2010 17:46:14 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at closedmail.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) From: Bart Schaefer Message-id: <100204094549.ZM10607@torch.brasslantern.com> Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 09:45:49 -0800 In-reply-to: Comments: In reply to "Benjamin R. Haskell" "Manpage names in Doc [w/ patch]" (Feb 4, 12:22pm) References: X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005) To: zsh-workers@zsh.org Subject: Re: Manpage names in Doc [w/ patch] MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Feb 4, 12:22pm, Benjamin R. Haskell wrote: } } Patch attached and inlined (What's the preference? I never remember). Inlined shows up better in the list archives, as I recall. Personally I don't mind attachments as long as they're labeled as text/plain rather than as some nonstandard thing like text/x-diff.