From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22221 invoked from network); 15 Oct 2001 18:13:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.90) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 15 Oct 2001 18:13:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 10048 invoked by alias); 15 Oct 2001 18:13:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 16058 Received: (qmail 10036 invoked from network); 15 Oct 2001 18:13:33 -0000 From: Borsenkow Andrej To: Zsh hackers list Subject: Re: Buglette & Fix for checkrmall in 4.0.2 In-Reply-To: <8465.1003165637@csr.com> References: <8465.1003165637@csr.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution/0.14 (Preview Release) Date: 15 Oct 2001 22:13:18 +0400 Message-Id: <1003169603.2222.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 On =F0=CE=C4, 2001-10-15 at 21:07, Peter Stephenson wrote: > Bart Schaefer wrote: > > This raises the question of whether a backgrounded subshell should = still > > have the INTERACTIVE option set. >=20 > Yes, we already unset MONITOR and USEZLE. I remember wondering about = this > some time ago and not coming to a definite conclusion. On the whole = I > think it's a good idea (we certainly don't any terminal setup stuff = to run > in the subshell) but that doesn't mean it won't break something. >=20 I have very vague recollection that I complained about this once and somebody (Bart? Peter?) gave me valid reasons why it should not be unset. But may be it was another option, -andrej