From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-28323-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 18874 invoked by alias); 6 Oct 2010 01:45:29 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 28323
Received: (qmail 10789 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2010 01:45:27 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at closedmail.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
Message-id: <101005184516.ZM5356@torch.brasslantern.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2010 18:45:16 -0700
In-reply-to: <AANLkTimHq_JAk55-mVHTS2F6xTJcY_W8cACQ67k9H2xb@mail.gmail.com>
Comments: In reply to Wayne Davison <wayned@users.sourceforge.net>
 "Re: git repository" (Oct  5,  3:04pm)
References: <20101005222639.03ff44c1@pws-pc>
	<alpine.LNX.2.01.1010051732510.21068@hp>
	<AANLkTimHq_JAk55-mVHTS2F6xTJcY_W8cACQ67k9H2xb@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005)
To: "Zsh Hackers' List" <zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Subject: Re: git repository
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On Oct 5,  3:04pm, Wayne Davison wrote:
}
} On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Benjamin R. Haskell <zsh@benizi.com> wrote:
} 
} > Is the git repo still "unofficial" with the CVS repo as the "one
} > true Zsh"?
}
} I'd be more inclined to call it unauthoritative, since the CVS is the
} master. I don't know how others feel about it, but think of it as a
} project-maintained mirror of the official source.

Commits into the git repo are not being pushed into CVS, as far as I
know.  I think that would preclude anything but CVS being considered
canonical.