From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29759 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2001 17:54:24 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (HELO sunsite.auc.dk) (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 10 Jan 2001 17:54:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 9349 invoked by alias); 10 Jan 2001 17:54:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 13337 Received: (qmail 9334 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2001 17:54:15 -0000 From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <1010110175349.ZM9349@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 17:53:49 +0000 In-Reply-To: <200101090851.JAA11093@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> Comments: In reply to Sven Wischnowsky "Re: new-style completition for gnu grep and ls" (Jan 9, 9:51am) References: <200101090851.JAA11093@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> X-Mailer: Z-Mail (5.0.0 30July97) To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk Subject: Completion services patch (Re: new-style completition for gnu grep and ls) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Jan 9, 9:51am, Sven Wischnowsky wrote: } Subject: Re: new-style completition for gnu grep and ls } } That also reminds me that my services-patch (`compdef krsh=rsh', see } 12977) is still not committed, mostly because I got no reply... Sorry, I have some three-month-or-more-old items sitting around waiting to be responded to. I think 12977 is fine. It's possible that part of the reason I didn't reply right away was that I was still trying to reconcile this with the more generalized aliasing scheme I mentioned in 12964, but I still don't have a clear idea whether/how such aliasing would be useful, so there's no point in holding this up. -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com Zsh: http://www.zsh.org | PHPerl Project: http://phperl.sourceforge.net