From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22487 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2001 18:25:46 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 27 Feb 2001 18:25:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 12582 invoked by alias); 27 Feb 2001 18:25:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 13551 Received: (qmail 12571 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2001 18:25:41 -0000 From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <1010227182504.ZM6452@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 18:25:04 +0000 In-Reply-To: <001901c0a0e5$9eeab230$21c9ca95@mow.siemens.ru> Comments: In reply to "Andrej Borsenkow" "RE: Global aliases, eval, and completion (Re: Expanding interactively aliases)" (Feb 27, 8:49pm) References: <001901c0a0e5$9eeab230$21c9ca95@mow.siemens.ru> X-Mailer: Z-Mail (5.0.0 30July97) To: Subject: Re: Global aliases, eval, and completion (Re: Expanding interactively aliases) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Feb 27, 8:49pm, Andrej Borsenkow wrote: } } > Turning off aliases when emulating sh sounds like the right thing to me. } } Why? POSIX shell defines aliases (but not global aliases IIRC). Oh, I'd forgotten about that. I still think in terms of emulating the pre-POSIX Bourne sh. As long as we're consistent about which one it is that we emulate, either way is fine with me. -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com Zsh: http://www.zsh.org | PHPerl Project: http://phperl.sourceforge.net