From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1871 invoked from network); 21 Mar 2001 09:05:44 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 21 Mar 2001 09:05:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 10044 invoked by alias); 21 Mar 2001 09:05:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 13681 Received: (qmail 10033 invoked from network); 21 Mar 2001 09:05:31 -0000 From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <1010321090448.ZM16774@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 09:04:47 +0000 In-Reply-To: Comments: In reply to Peter Stephenson "PATCH: _mh; handling of mail etc. completion" (Mar 20, 12:11pm) References: X-Mailer: Z-Mail (5.0.0 30July97) To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk (Zsh hackers list) Subject: Re: PATCH: _mh; handling of mail etc. completion MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Mar 20, 12:11pm, Peter Stephenson wrote: } Subject: PATCH: _mh; handling of mail etc. completion } } - There are no completions for standard mail programmes or common } tools like elm and pine. You'll note that _mailboxes can handle several such programs, though. We just don't have a file containing the #compdef line to hook it up. Of course there's more we *could* do ... even _mutt could, for example, grovel alias names out of the apprpriate config file to complete in the userhost state when there's no @ in the word yet. } - There is no special handling user@domain instead of user@host. This } can be done with contexts, but maybe it would be nicer to have some } special mail _user_at_host handling which allows pws@csr.com (where } csr.com doesn't appear in my normal hosts list for obvious reasons). Hmm. Is there anything else about the handling of domains that would be distinct from hosts? -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com Zsh: http://www.zsh.org | PHPerl Project: http://phperl.sourceforge.net