Re: Moving completion functions

["Bart Schaefer" <schaefer@candle.brasslantern.com>]

On Mar 22, 11:40am, Sven Wischnowsky wrote:
} Subject: Re: Moving completion functions
} 
} > Functions/Misc/is-at-least	Functions/Misc	# Needs un-ksh-autoloading
} 
} So should I change it to our normal format while moving it?

That's what I meant, yes.

} > Functions/Misc/acx		Functions/Examples	# Misc?
} > Functions/Misc/cx		Functions/Examples	# Misc?
} > Functions/Misc/yp		Functions/Examples	# Misc?
} > Functions/Misc/yu		Functions/Examples	# Misc?
} 
} I've always thought that these are almost not worth a separate
} function file.  Because of that I think `Examples' is fine.

[...]

} Changing top-level directory names to their singular forms seems to
} not have been considered anymore.

Oh, I forgot about that.  At least make that Functions/Example rather
than Examples.  I wouldn't object to Function/* either, but I wasn't
thinking about directory renaming.  (A problem with directory renaming
in CVS is that you then forever afterward have to remember to use
"cvs update -P" to keep the empty directories out of your sandbox.)

-- 
Bart Schaefer                                 Brass Lantern Enterprises
http://www.well.com/user/barts              http://www.brasslantern.com

Zsh: http://www.zsh.org | PHPerl Project: http://phperl.sourceforge.net