From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15840 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2001 23:50:14 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 25 Mar 2001 23:50:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 7105 invoked by alias); 25 Mar 2001 23:50:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 13759 Received: (qmail 7094 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2001 23:50:06 -0000 From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <1010325234953.ZM11680@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 23:49:53 +0000 X-Mailer: Z-Mail (5.0.0 30July97) To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk Subject: INTERACTIVE vs. SHINSTDIN MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii zagzig[514] Src/zsh -fis <<<'echo hi' zagzig% read -e echo hi zagzig% cat zagzig% Hmm, so SHINSTDIN is true, but in fact the shell is not reading commands from stdin ... yet commands started by the shell read from the actual stdin, not from where the shell is reading commands from ... I suppose one can get some interesting effects this way, but is it really the correct behavior? -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com Zsh: http://www.zsh.org | PHPerl Project: http://phperl.sourceforge.net