From: "Bart Schaefer" <schaefer@candle.brasslantern.com>
To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk
Subject: Re: "setopt noexec" and interactive shells
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 19:58:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1010327195840.ZM14429@candle.brasslantern.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E14hz5z-0006hO-00@crucigera.fysh.org>
On Mar 27, 8:25pm, Zefram wrote:
} Subject: Re: "setopt noexec" and interactive shells
}
} *grumble*. What's anyone ever going to use noexec for other than syntax
} checking?
Well, yes, exactly. Isn't it possible that you'd like to check the syntax
of a function you have defined in an interactive shell?
} I'd prefer that we give the option a consistent behaviour.
The consistent behavior I was thinking of is that commands entered at a
shell prompt (e.g. through ZLE) are never affected by `noexec' whereas
all other commands are. How is that any less consistent than, say, the
SHINSTDIN behavior we were just discussing?
} For the record, pdksh makes no such distinction between commands in a
} function and commands at the top level
Right, but ksh doesn't have `localoptions'.
I don't mean to be making too big a deal of this, but I want to be sure we
can explain/defend whatever implementation eventually results.
--
Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises
http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com
Zsh: http://www.zsh.org | PHPerl Project: http://phperl.sourceforge.net
prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-03-27 19:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-03-04 5:20 Bart Schaefer
2001-03-05 1:55 ` Zefram
2001-03-25 22:51 ` Bart Schaefer
2001-03-25 23:05 ` Bart Schaefer
2001-03-27 18:09 ` Zefram
2001-03-27 19:12 ` Zefram
2001-03-30 6:37 ` Bart Schaefer
2001-03-27 19:18 ` Bart Schaefer
2001-03-27 19:25 ` Zefram
2001-03-27 19:58 ` Bart Schaefer [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1010327195840.ZM14429@candle.brasslantern.com \
--to=schaefer@candle.brasslantern.com \
--cc=zsh-workers@sunsite.dk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.vuxu.org/mirror/zsh/
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).