From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4653 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2001 16:44:16 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 29 Mar 2001 16:44:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 19437 invoked by alias); 29 Mar 2001 16:44:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 13843 Received: (qmail 19424 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2001 16:44:08 -0000 From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <1010329164349.ZM19412@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 16:43:49 +0000 In-Reply-To: <200103291409.QAA20643@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> Comments: In reply to Sven Wischnowsky "Re: PATCH: Re: Backticks and other tricks" (Mar 29, 4:09pm) References: <200103291409.QAA20643@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> X-Mailer: Z-Mail (5.0.0 30July97) To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk Subject: Re: PATCH: Re: Backticks and other tricks MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Mar 29, 4:09pm, Sven Wischnowsky wrote: } } Bart Schaefer wrote: } } > The only thing that worries me, given this explanation, is clusters of } > single-letter options, like some of the very specialized cases in _rpm. } } I've been thinking about this all day. How is this different from the } situation I wanted to fix with the change? Probably it's not different and I was needlessly concerned. Thanks for sharing your thought-process. -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com Zsh: http://www.zsh.org | PHPerl Project: http://phperl.sourceforge.net