From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27803 invoked from network); 8 May 2001 18:09:35 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 8 May 2001 18:09:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 9654 invoked by alias); 8 May 2001 18:09:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 14267 Received: (qmail 9634 invoked from network); 8 May 2001 18:09:23 -0000 From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <1010508180740.ZM7293@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Tue, 8 May 2001 18:07:40 +0000 In-Reply-To: Comments: In reply to Peter Stephenson "Re: Termcap saga again" (May 8, 5:23pm) References: X-Mailer: Z-Mail (5.0.0 30July97) To: Peter Stephenson , zsh-workers@sunsite.dk (Zsh hackers list) Subject: Re: Termcap saga again MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On May 8, 5:23pm, Peter Stephenson wrote: } } Actually, AC_TRY_COMPILE is OK, it was only AC_CHECK_HEADERS that barfed on } the warnings. This means rewriting bits of the AC_CHECK_HEADERS internals } to get the right definitions. Here's the combined diff. Or do the } COMPILEs here still need to be LINKs? The `printf(*test)' is only necessary if they're changed to LINKs. (I had overlooked that before.) So if it's not AC_TRY_COMPILE that is causing the error, then you can drop my patch entirely. } This gets worse and worse. I can't believe how long I've wasted on this, } and lots of other people have wasted a good bit longer. Curses is a complete disaster and always has been. I could bore you all with stories about writing the "full screen character terminal" interface for Z-Mail (so-called "Lite"), but you've already got the flavor of them. -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com Zsh: http://www.zsh.org | PHPerl Project: http://phperl.sourceforge.net