From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-14601-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@sunsite.dk>
Received: (qmail 2402 invoked from network); 31 May 2001 07:32:38 -0000
Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.51.30)
  by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 31 May 2001 07:32:38 -0000
Received: (qmail 24333 invoked by alias); 31 May 2001 07:32:30 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Seq: 14601
Received: (qmail 24320 invoked from network); 31 May 2001 07:32:29 -0000
From: "Bart Schaefer" <schaefer@candle.brasslantern.com>
Message-Id: <1010531073216.ZM5645@candle.brasslantern.com>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 07:32:15 +0000
In-Reply-To: <200105310714.JAA10225@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de>
Comments: In reply to Sven Wischnowsky <wischnow@informatik.hu-berlin.de>
        "PATCH: matchers in _multi_parts" (May 31,  9:14am)
References: <200105310714.JAA10225@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de>
X-Mailer: Z-Mail (5.0.0 30July97)
To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk
Subject: Re: PATCH: matchers in _multi_parts
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On May 31,  9:14am, Sven Wischnowsky wrote:
} Subject: PATCH: matchers in _multi_parts
}
} I wonder why we didn't see before that _multi_parts didn't always use
} the match specs it got.

Because it's only used in 5 completion functions out of 294?