From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5598 invoked from network); 6 Jun 2001 10:20:14 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 6 Jun 2001 10:20:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 9745 invoked by alias); 6 Jun 2001 10:19:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 14744 Received: (qmail 9710 invoked from network); 6 Jun 2001 10:19:48 -0000 X-Authentication-Warning: candle.brasslantern.com: schaefer set sender to lantern@shell10.ba.best.com using -f From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <1010606101838.ZM1248@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 10:18:38 +0000 In-Reply-To: Comments: In reply to Peter Stephenson "Re: PATCH: Re: 4.0.1 - arguments test fails" (Jun 6, 10:51am) References: X-Mailer: Z-Mail (5.0.0 30July97) To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk (Zsh hackers list) Subject: Branch patches (Re: PATCH: Re: 4.0.1 - arguments test fails) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Jun 6, 10:51am, Peter Stephenson wrote: } } In general they shouldn't go straight onto the 4.0 branch until after a bit } of testing, but this one is presumably an improvement. Bart's suggestion } is someone (probably me, it looks like) applies all the 4.0 changes, but } I'm not enthusiastic about doing it all myself at the moment. Actually my suggestion would be that someone (probably you, but we could divide up responsibility, e.g., could be Sven for the completion system) give an "OK, go ahead" before patches were merged from development to stable -- but that doesn't mean it's essential that the "moderator" do the actual patching. -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com Zsh: http://www.zsh.org | PHPerl Project: http://phperl.sourceforge.net