From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22069 invoked from network); 16 Jun 2001 17:31:49 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 16 Jun 2001 17:31:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 2502 invoked by alias); 16 Jun 2001 17:31:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 14945 Received: (qmail 2484 invoked from network); 16 Jun 2001 17:31:10 -0000 X-Authentication-Warning: candle.brasslantern.com: schaefer set sender to lantern@shell10.ba.best.com using -f From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <1010616173102.ZM5361@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 17:31:02 +0000 X-Mailer: Z-Mail (5.0.0 30July97) To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk Subject: Extraneous CVS branch tags? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Working file: Src/params.c symbolic names: zsh-4_0-patches: 1.48.0.4 zsh-4_0_1-patches: 1.48.0.2 I suspect we should delete the zsh-4_0_1-patches tag? It's only going to confuse people (like, me). Unfortunately, I don't recall all the ramifications of deleting branch tags. I think it should be harmless as long as there's no activity on that branch (which should be the case here, I hope). -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com Zsh: http://www.zsh.org | PHPerl Project: http://phperl.sourceforge.net