From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4624 invoked from network); 19 Aug 2001 04:16:19 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 19 Aug 2001 04:16:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 26133 invoked by alias); 19 Aug 2001 04:16:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 15661 Received: (qmail 26122 invoked from network); 19 Aug 2001 04:16:10 -0000 From: Bart Schaefer Message-Id: <1010819041605.ZM16095@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2001 04:16:04 +0000 In-Reply-To: <1010814045738.ZM6709@candle.brasslantern.com> Comments: In reply to Bart Schaefer "Re: Bug with exit status of zsh -c" (Aug 14, 4:57am) References: <010813184613.ZM6167@candle.brasslantern.com> <1010814045738.ZM6709@candle.brasslantern.com> X-Mailer: Z-Mail (5.0.0 30July97) To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk Subject: Re: Bug with exit status of zsh -c MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Aug 14, 4:57am, Bart Schaefer wrote: } } Is this really all that's necessary? Nobody has said "boo" about this one way or the other -- my only worry, really, is about the cases where last1 is supposed to be set to 2 -- so I'm going to go ahead and commit it and we just have to be sure that it has been tested before we release 4.0.3. (For reference, I'm talking about zsh-workers/15617.) -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com Zsh: http://www.zsh.org | PHPerl Project: http://phperl.sourceforge.net