From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13549 invoked from network); 15 Oct 2001 17:11:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.90) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 15 Oct 2001 17:11:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 26033 invoked by alias); 15 Oct 2001 17:11:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 16054 Received: (qmail 26018 invoked from network); 15 Oct 2001 17:11:05 -0000 From: Bart Schaefer Message-Id: <1011015171102.ZM8325@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 17:11:01 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20011015145302.A5483@primenet.com.au> Comments: In reply to Geoff Wing "Re: Clearing RPS1: Is there a better way to do this?" (Oct 15, 2:53pm) References: <20011015145302.A5483@primenet.com.au> X-Mailer: Z-Mail (5.0.0 30July97) To: Zsh Hackers Subject: Re: Clearing RPS1: Is there a better way to do this? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Oct 15, 2:53pm, Geoff Wing wrote: } } Bart Schaefer typed: } :Othere suggestions (including Geoff jumping up and offering to implement } :this in the ZLE code) would be welcome. } } Controlled by setopt #136? Name suggestion? That was my original thought, but I've been batting around the idea of having it controlled by a prompt escape. It'd be a bit odd to have an escape that means something only in the right prompt, I guess. I was even thinking maybe of overloading %E, e.g. in the right prompt, %-1E causes it to be deleted after the fact, or something like that. Probably that's just too strange. `setopt TRANSIENT_RPROMPT', perhaps? -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com Zsh: http://www.zsh.org | PHPerl Project: http://phperl.sourceforge.net