From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1593 invoked from network); 16 Oct 2001 15:18:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.90) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 16 Oct 2001 15:18:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 11334 invoked by alias); 16 Oct 2001 15:17:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 16067 Received: (qmail 11254 invoked from network); 16 Oct 2001 15:17:49 -0000 From: Bart Schaefer Message-Id: <1011016151646.ZM10674@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 15:16:45 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20011016152640.A18535@primenet.com.au> Comments: In reply to Geoff Wing "PATCH: Re: Clearing RPS1: Is there a better way to do this?" (Oct 16, 3:26pm) References: <20011015145302.A5483@primenet.com.au> <1011015171102.ZM8325@candle.brasslantern.com> <20011016152640.A18535@primenet.com.au> X-Mailer: Z-Mail (5.0.0 30July97) To: Zsh Hackers Subject: Re: PATCH: Re: Clearing RPS1: Is there a better way to do this? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Oct 16, 3:26pm, Geoff Wing wrote: } Subject: PATCH: Re: Clearing RPS1: Is there a better way to do this? } } Bart Schaefer typed: } :`setopt TRANSIENT_RPROMPT', perhaps? } } RPROMPT won't disappear after positive response to > LISTMAX type questions. That's not a problem. } If this works OK for people (especially those who use } ALWAYS_LAST_PROMPT (I don't)), I'll get some docs together for it. I've got ALWAYS_LAST_PROMPT set, and it appears to work fine for me. Thanks! -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com Zsh: http://www.zsh.org | PHPerl Project: http://phperl.sourceforge.net