From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6850 invoked from network); 12 Feb 2002 15:53:24 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 12 Feb 2002 15:53:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 5055 invoked by alias); 12 Feb 2002 15:53:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 16612 Received: (qmail 5038 invoked from network); 12 Feb 2002 15:53:16 -0000 From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <1020212155300.ZM10095@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 15:53:00 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20020212045901.A10430@eskimo.eskimo.com> Comments: In reply to Derek Peschel "why is 2 the smallest HISTSIZE?" (Feb 12, 4:59am) References: <20020212045901.A10430@eskimo.eskimo.com> X-Mailer: Z-Mail (5.0.0 30July97) To: Derek Peschel , zsh-workers@sunsite.dk Subject: Re: why is 2 the smallest HISTSIZE? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Feb 12, 4:59am, Derek Peschel wrote: } } Did the implementation (of the "last command" buffer) change, but the } 2 not get changed to 1? I think that's what happened, but only Wayne Davison can say for certain. -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com Zsh: http://www.zsh.org | PHPerl Project: http://phperl.sourceforge.net