From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20079 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2002 18:32:17 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 11 Mar 2002 18:32:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 7106 invoked by alias); 11 Mar 2002 18:32:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 16807 Received: (qmail 7073 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2002 18:32:10 -0000 From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <1020311182942.ZM27214@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 18:29:41 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20020311053241.GA9027@dman.com> Comments: In reply to Clint Adams "Y test failures (zpty)" (Mar 11, 12:32am) References: <20020311053241.GA9027@dman.com> X-Mailer: Z-Mail (5.0.0 30July97) To: Clint Adams , zsh-workers@sunsite.dk Subject: Re: Y test failures (zpty) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Mar 11, 12:32am, Clint Adams wrote: } } Any ideas what's going on? It would appear that the get_pty() function is failing. Why that's happening, I couldn't say. There are two different versions of that function in zpty.c -- is the wrong one getting used for some reason? Has the naming convention for pty devices changed? -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com Zsh: http://www.zsh.org | PHPerl Project: http://phperl.sourceforge.net