From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2878 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2002 02:53:25 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 12 Mar 2002 02:53:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 27533 invoked by alias); 12 Mar 2002 02:53:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 16809 Received: (qmail 27521 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2002 02:53:15 -0000 From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <1020311192523.ZM27256@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 19:25:22 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20020311190231.GA21327@dman.com> Comments: In reply to Clint Adams "Re: Y test failures (zpty)" (Mar 11, 2:02pm) References: <20020311053241.GA9027@dman.com> <1020311182942.ZM27214@candle.brasslantern.com> <20020311190231.GA21327@dman.com> X-Mailer: Z-Mail (5.0.0 30July97) To: Clint Adams Subject: Re: Y test failures (zpty) Cc: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Mar 11, 2:02pm, Clint Adams wrote: } } I have Unix98 ptys in /dev/pts (this is what nearly everything uses), } and I have /dev/pty?? as compatibility symlinks to /dev/pty/m[0-9]+. Is it possible that all the /dev/pty?? terminals are simply used up? -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com Zsh: http://www.zsh.org | PHPerl Project: http://phperl.sourceforge.net