From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3271 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2003 16:15:48 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 5 Feb 2003 16:15:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 5178 invoked by alias); 5 Feb 2003 16:15:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 18200 Received: (qmail 5171 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2003 16:15:37 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO sunsite.dk) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 5 Feb 2003 16:15:37 -0000 X-MessageWall-Score: 0 (sunsite.dk) Received: from [4.46.181.248] by sunsite.dk (MessageWall 1.0.8) with SMTP; 5 Feb 2003 16:15:36 -0000 Received: (from schaefer@localhost) by candle.brasslantern.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h15GFbT22235; Wed, 5 Feb 2003 08:15:37 -0800 From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <1030205161536.ZM22234@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 16:15:36 +0000 In-Reply-To: <15935.16623.823108.734629@phl.itasoftware.com> Comments: In reply to gak@klanderman.net (Greg Klanderman) "Re: alwayslastprompt problem" (Feb 3, 11:26pm) References: <15934.59328.619062.393204@phl.itasoftware.com> <1030204025755.ZM15281@candle.brasslantern.com> <15935.16623.823108.734629@phl.itasoftware.com> X-Mailer: Z-Mail (5.0.0 30July97) To: gak@klanderman.net, zsh-workers@sunsite.dk (Zsh list) Subject: Re: alwayslastprompt problem MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Feb 3, 11:26pm, Greg Klanderman wrote: } } Is there any reason zsh couldn't handle alwayslastprompt in this } situation? It appears to be an order-of-initialization issue. In a non-interactive shell, the terminal isn't set up until vared is actually invoked, and for some reason that causes the ZLE refresh routines to believe that it isn't possible to do alwayslastprompt. I haven't figured out exactly what is different in the two cases.