From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6612 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2003 15:47:26 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 1 Apr 2003 15:47:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 3970 invoked by alias); 1 Apr 2003 15:47:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 18422 Received: (qmail 3955 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2003 15:47:10 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO sunsite.dk) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 1 Apr 2003 15:47:10 -0000 X-MessageWall-Score: 0 (sunsite.dk) Received: from [4.3.58.174] by sunsite.dk (MessageWall 1.0.8) with SMTP; 1 Apr 2003 15:47:9 -0000 Received: (from schaefer@localhost) by candle.brasslantern.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h31Fl8u17797 for zsh-workers@sunsite.dk; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 07:47:08 -0800 From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <1030401154707.ZM17796@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 15:47:07 +0000 In-Reply-To: <2067.1049190004@csr.com> Comments: In reply to Peter Stephenson "Re: PATCH: RLIMITS macros" (Apr 1, 10:40am) References: <2067.1049190004@csr.com> X-Mailer: Z-Mail (5.0.0 30July97) To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk (Zsh hackers list) Subject: Re: PATCH: RLIMITS macros MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Apr 1, 10:40am, Peter Stephenson wrote: } Subject: Re: PATCH: RLIMITS macros } } "Bart Schaefer" wrote: } > checking if RLIMIT_VMEM and RLIMIT_RSS are the same... no } > checking if RLIMIT_VMEM and RLIMIT_AS are the same... no } } Does that mean RLIMIT_AS and RLIMIT_VMEM aren't actually definitions at } all? It means that both RLIMIT_AS and RLIMIT_RSS are defined, are different from one another, and that RLIMIT_VMEM is not defined at all. (I see that you've followed up and I'll try that patch but I thought the above might be useful anyway.)