From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-19570-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@sunsite.dk>
Received: (qmail 24710 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2004 22:20:11 -0000
Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90)
  by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 8 Mar 2004 22:20:11 -0000
Received: (qmail 3490 invoked by alias); 8 Mar 2004 22:20:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Seq: 19570
Received: (qmail 3472 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2004 22:20:02 -0000
Received: from localhost (HELO sunsite.dk) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 8 Mar 2004 22:20:02 -0000
X-MessageWall-Score: 0 (sunsite.dk)
Received: from [4.11.9.147] by sunsite.dk (MessageWall 1.0.8) with SMTP; 8 Mar 2004 22:20:1 -0000
Received: (from schaefer@localhost)
	by candle.brasslantern.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id i28MJx214000;
	Mon, 8 Mar 2004 14:19:59 -0800
X-Authentication-Warning: candle.brasslantern.com: schaefer set sender to schaefer@closedmail.com using -f
From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
Message-Id: <1040308221959.ZM13999@candle.brasslantern.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 22:19:59 +0000
In-Reply-To: <20040308152325.GB9385@scowler.net>
Comments: In reply to Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>
        "[frederik@ugcs.caltech.edu: Bug#236748: zsh: associative array documentation reference broken]" (Mar  8, 10:23am)
References: <20040308152325.GB9385@scowler.net>
X-Mailer: Z-Mail (5.0.0 30July97)
To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk
Subject: Re: [frederik@ugcs.caltech.edu: Bug#236748: zsh: associative array documentation reference broken]
Cc: 236748-forwarded@bugs.debian.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On Mar 8, 10:23am, Clint Adams wrote:
}
}  For associative arrays, `[*]' or `[@]' evaluate to all the values
}  (not the keys, but see Subscript Flags below), in no particular
}  order.
} 
} There is nothing relevant to this syntax under Subscript Flags.

Yes, there is.  The k, K, and e subscript flags all affect the
intepretation of * and @.  It's true that [(K)*] is nearly the same
as [*], but [(k)*] is quite different, as both [(k)@] and [(K)@] are
from [@].

}  For associative arrays, `[*]' or `[@]' evaluate to all the values
}  (not the keys, but see the documentation for the 'k' flag under
}  Parameter Expansion Flags in zshexpn(1)), in no particular order.

No, this is NOT what it should say, or at least not ALL that it should
say.