From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15864 invoked from network); 20 Jun 2005 15:25:44 -0000 Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 20 Jun 2005 15:25:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 51405 invoked from network); 20 Jun 2005 15:25:38 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 20 Jun 2005 15:25:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 26062 invoked by alias); 20 Jun 2005 15:25:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 21365 Received: (qmail 26053 invoked from network); 20 Jun 2005 15:25:34 -0000 Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88) by sunsite.dk with SMTP; 20 Jun 2005 15:25:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 51053 invoked from network); 20 Jun 2005 15:25:34 -0000 Received: from vms046pub.verizon.net (206.46.252.46) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 20 Jun 2005 15:25:30 -0000 Received: from candle.brasslantern.com ([71.116.88.149]) by vms046.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2 HotFix 0.04 (built Dec 24 2004)) with ESMTPA id <0IIE00GB02RFWV10@vms046.mailsrvcs.net> for zsh-workers@sunsite.dk; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 10:23:40 -0500 (CDT) Received: from candle.brasslantern.com (IDENT:schaefer@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by candle.brasslantern.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j5KFNccO021592 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 08:23:38 -0700 Received: (from schaefer@localhost) by candle.brasslantern.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id j5KFNcxv021591 for zsh-workers@sunsite.dk; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 08:23:38 -0700 Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 15:23:37 +0000 From: Bart Schaefer Subject: Re: LONG_LIST_JOBS doesn't affect all job listings? In-reply-to: <200506200955.j5K9t6fN005782@news01.csr.com> To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk Message-id: <1050620152337.ZM21590@candle.brasslantern.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Z-Mail (5.0.0 30July97) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii References: <1050620034619.ZM21043@candle.brasslantern.com> <200506200955.j5K9t6fN005782@news01.csr.com> Comments: In reply to Peter Stephenson "Re: LONG_LIST_JOBS doesn't affect all job listings?" (Jun 20, 10:55am) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 on a.mx.sunsite.dk X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=6.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Hits: -2.6 On Jun 20, 10:55am, Peter Stephenson wrote: } Subject: Re: LONG_LIST_JOBS doesn't affect all job listings? } } I would certainly have said bg and fg should work like job } notifications, at least. Even job notifications aren't consistent; only *asynchronous* notices get the long format. If you have no_notify set, the short form is used. [That's because scanjobs() also ignores long_list_jobs.] } Is this connected with users/8989? The messages seem to be generally } rather inconsistent. Yes; I was peeking at how difficult it would be to implement tcsh's option, and was using LONGLISTJOBS as a placeholder (and wondering if perhaps it couldn't just be employed full time as a stand-in).