From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22573 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2005 03:07:29 -0000 Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 11 Jul 2005 03:07:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 96527 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2005 03:07:23 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 11 Jul 2005 03:07:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 8317 invoked by alias); 11 Jul 2005 03:07:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 21426 Received: (qmail 8308 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2005 03:07:19 -0000 Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88) by sunsite.dk with SMTP; 11 Jul 2005 03:07:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 96213 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2005 03:07:19 -0000 Received: from vms044pub.verizon.net (206.46.252.44) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 11 Jul 2005 03:07:14 -0000 Received: from candle.brasslantern.com ([71.116.88.149]) by vms044.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2 HotFix 0.04 (built Dec 24 2004)) with ESMTPA id <0IJG00KK30O04JQQ@vms044.mailsrvcs.net> for zsh-workers@sunsite.dk; Sun, 10 Jul 2005 22:07:14 -0500 (CDT) Received: from candle.brasslantern.com (IDENT:schaefer@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by candle.brasslantern.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j6B37Bf8024702; Sun, 10 Jul 2005 20:07:11 -0700 Received: (from schaefer@localhost) by candle.brasslantern.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id j6B3758a024701; Sun, 10 Jul 2005 20:07:05 -0700 Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 03:07:04 +0000 From: Bart Schaefer Subject: Re: [Brian May] zsh random behaviour In-reply-to: To: Brian May , zsh-workers@sunsite.dk Message-id: <1050711030705.ZM24700@candle.brasslantern.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Z-Mail (5.0.0 30July97) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii References: Comments: In reply to Brian May "[Brian May] zsh random behaviour" (Jul 11, 11:32am) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 on a.mx.sunsite.dk X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=6.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Hits: -2.6 On Jul 11, 11:32am, Brian May wrote: } } Is a return value of 255 treated specially by zsh? A return value > 127 is interpreted as "killed by a signal" where the signal number is the return value minus 127. This is pretty standard for shells, though not well-documented by any of them. } I was about to start pulling my hair out, but I will let you pull your } hair out instead . See the "subtle 'echo' bug" thread from last month in the zsh-workers archive, finishing with the patch in article 21391.