From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
To: cheer_xiao <xiaqqaix@gmail.com>, zsh-workers@zsh.org
Subject: Re: Slow completion when using aptitude
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 09:29:44 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <110126092944.ZM2205@torch.brasslantern.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <110126090508.ZM2111@torch.brasslantern.com>
On Jan 26, 9:05am, Bart Schaefer wrote:
} Subject: Re: Slow completion when using aptitude
}
} Comparing _complete_debug output for the two, the main difference
} seems to be that _aptitude passes through _deb_packages repeatedly
} if you have a matcher-list, while _apt makes only a single pass.
Oh, forgot to mention -- the _apt completer, at least for apt-get,
seems to suffer from the common bug of returning 0 when it finds no
completions, fooling the higher layers into thinking it succeeded
but there's nothing to do rather than that it failed. Of course it
may be that this is the right thing in this case, and _aptitude is
instead buggy when it returns 1 in the same circumstance.
That's probably why the number of passes through _deb_packages differs.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-26 17:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-17 9:51 cheer_xiao
2011-01-19 12:33 ` Richard Hartmann
2011-01-26 5:11 ` cheer_xiao
2011-01-26 7:51 ` Julien Nicoulaud
2011-01-26 8:35 ` Frank Terbeck
2011-01-26 14:21 ` cheer_xiao
2011-01-26 14:55 ` Frank Terbeck
2011-01-26 17:05 ` Bart Schaefer
2011-01-26 17:29 ` Bart Schaefer [this message]
2011-01-30 2:49 ` cheer_xiao
2011-01-30 5:16 ` Bart Schaefer
2011-01-30 5:53 ` cheer_xiao
2011-01-30 7:15 ` Bart Schaefer
2011-01-30 10:40 ` Julien Nicoulaud
2011-01-30 10:51 ` Julien Nicoulaud
2011-01-30 11:18 ` cheer_xiao
2011-01-31 0:02 ` Bart Schaefer
2011-02-03 10:21 ` cheer_xiao
2011-02-03 14:56 ` Bart Schaefer
2011-02-04 3:24 ` cheer_xiao
[not found] ` <AANLkTinfzf6gM5Z83_+iQqkc+QVzGGKa3yqbPTa+Wm3A@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <110203193315.ZM22047@torch.brasslantern.com>
2011-02-04 3:44 ` cheer_xiao
2011-02-04 3:48 ` cheer_xiao
2011-02-04 4:29 ` Bart Schaefer
2011-02-04 5:46 ` cheer_xiao
2011-02-04 15:04 ` Bart Schaefer
2011-02-05 9:13 ` cheer_xiao
[not found] ` <AANLkTinftiPPV-TtNU5DQ1+TV6Tb5P6AprBsRGdjoamB@mail.gmail.com>
2011-02-05 9:21 ` cheer_xiao
2011-02-05 9:30 ` cheer_xiao
2011-02-05 17:12 ` gi1242+zsh
2011-02-05 17:48 ` Bart Schaefer
2011-02-05 18:40 ` gi1242+zsh
2011-02-05 17:46 ` Bart Schaefer
2011-02-03 10:23 ` cheer_xiao
2011-02-03 14:51 ` Bart Schaefer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=110126092944.ZM2205@torch.brasslantern.com \
--to=schaefer@brasslantern.com \
--cc=xiaqqaix@gmail.com \
--cc=zsh-workers@zsh.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.vuxu.org/mirror/zsh/
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).