From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-28867-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 10363 invoked by alias); 6 Mar 2011 22:03:06 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 28867
Received: (qmail 13510 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2011 22:03:03 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at closedmail.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
Message-id: <110306140249.ZM8874@torch.brasslantern.com>
Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2011 14:02:49 -0800
In-reply-to: <m3ei6kau85.fsf@klanderman.net>
Comments: In reply to Greg Klanderman <gak@klanderman.net>
 "Re: PATCH: zstyle to control completion of functions/parameters beginning
 with underscore" (Mar  6,  3:07pm)
References: <1238890030-4683-1-git-send-email-ft@bewatermyfriend.org>
	<090404193718.ZM19801@torch.brasslantern.com>	<20090405191304.1908fca8@pws-pc>
	<090405151115.ZM13159@torch.brasslantern.com>	<20090406100929.505617e2@news01>
	<2d460de70905270930j681da6a5kf7848d67d89f0c69@mail.gmail.com>
	<20090527175941.3bbe2eba@news01>	<m37i02cqd9.fsf@klanderman.net>
	<2d460de70905280148iebfcegcb4143c33e510efd@mail.gmail.com>
	<m3ei6qvalg.fsf_-_@klanderman.net>  <7658.1299027908@thecus>
	<m38vwxuzml.fsf@klanderman.net>	<110302153027.ZM10605@torch.brasslantern.com>
	<m339n4uskj.fsf@klanderman.net>	<110303085435.ZM12072@torch.brasslantern.com>
	<m3ei6kau85.fsf@klanderman.net>
X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005)
To: zsh-workers@zsh.org
Subject: Re: PATCH: zstyle to control completion of functions/parameters
 beginning with underscore
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On Mar 6,  3:07pm, Greg Klanderman wrote:
}
} Hi Bart, was my revised patch from Thursday morning OK, or would you
} like it to be vaguer w.r.t. the default behavior?

It's fine.