From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-29016-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 18730 invoked by alias); 19 Apr 2011 16:33:46 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 29016
Received: (qmail 1740 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2011 16:33:44 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at closedmail.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
Message-id: <110419093318.ZM15141@torch.brasslantern.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 09:33:18 -0700
In-reply-to: <20110419165050.17b50288@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
Comments: In reply to Peter Stephenson <Peter.Stephenson@csr.com>
 "Re: Possible 4.3.12?" (Apr 19,  4:50pm)
References: <87fwpe487l.fsf@ft.bewatermyfriend.org>
	<20110419165050.17b50288@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005)
To: <zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Subject: Re: Possible 4.3.12?
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On Apr 19,  4:50pm, Peter Stephenson wrote:
} Subject: Re: Possible 4.3.12?
}
} On Tue, 19 Apr 2011 16:38:38 +0200
} Frank Terbeck <ft@bewatermyfriend.org> wrote:
} > I'm wondering whether releasing 4.3.12 would be a good idea.
} 
} Probably, although I'm on holiday from tomorrow

Well, that's traditionally when we do new versions, isn't it? :-)