From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-29627-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 25762 invoked by alias); 27 Jul 2011 19:33:23 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 29627
Received: (qmail 20385 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2011 19:33:12 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at closedmail.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
Message-id: <110727123256.ZM22914@torch.brasslantern.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 12:32:56 -0700
In-reply-to:
 <CAHYJk3RQaPHsLOf+0ON89Miqmh6gXH9ubtzxz7X3tY_LSLfMtw@mail.gmail.com>
Comments: In reply to Mikael Magnusson <mikachu@gmail.com>
 "Re: completers using zstat don't work with zmodload -F zsh/stat" (Jul 27,
 8:24pm)
References:
 <CAHYJk3RmB+sYiUQ7BXX7qaJJ9s-NPg0JmCVB03H+_sTx+=a6Qw@mail.gmail.com>
	<110727012046.ZM21543@torch.brasslantern.com>
	<CAHYJk3STqY6PnSfbLXEsjMxjrRwNCRirLgSFpWATQ=rUx5GCrQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<110727093848.ZM22383@torch.brasslantern.com>
	<CAHYJk3STCr48Cv+vSVXK+nAcpUv_UbzBwQ_4dt+CKzeRqpqqig@mail.gmail.com>
	<110727111829.ZM22827@torch.brasslantern.com>
	<CAHYJk3RQaPHsLOf+0ON89Miqmh6gXH9ubtzxz7X3tY_LSLfMtw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005)
To: zsh workers <zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Subject: Re: completers using zstat don't work with zmodload -F zsh/stat
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On Jul 27,  8:24pm, Mikael Magnusson wrote:
}
} Hm, but if it's only loaded at "runtime", why does the alias get
} expanded then? My user doesn't have the zstat alias. Are aliases still
} expanded during compilation inside function definitions but -U is
} somehow not active? (This sounds odd).

That does sound odd.  I suppose you can try running zrecompile with
set -x and/or set -v and catch the zcompile calls to be sure that
the -U option is in fact being passed through.  I suppose it's not
impossible that some other recent change has mucked up the use of
the "noaliases" C-code global to control this.