From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-29737-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 25256 invoked by alias); 29 Aug 2011 15:26:27 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 29737
Received: (qmail 26744 invoked from network); 29 Aug 2011 15:26:24 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at closedmail.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
Message-id: <110829082605.ZM2790@torch.brasslantern.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 08:26:05 -0700
In-reply-to: <20110828175014.7750a85e@pws-pc.ntlworld.com>
Comments: In reply to Peter Stephenson <p.w.stephenson@ntlworld.com>
 "Re: Is "read -AE" buggy?" (Aug 28,  5:50pm)
References: <110823001827.ZM19096@torch.brasslantern.com>
	<20110828175014.7750a85e@pws-pc.ntlworld.com>
X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005)
To: zsh-workers@zsh.org
Subject: Re: Is "read -AE" buggy?
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On Aug 28,  5:50pm, Peter Stephenson wrote:
} Subject: Re: Is "read -AE" buggy?
}
} I think this is down to the fact that bin_read() is a complete mess
} where people dump in new features without any attempt to impose
} structure (fancy that happening in zsh...)

I'd have guessed that too except that this bug has apparently been
around since before the first CVS import in 1999.

Thanks for working out the patch.