From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9137 invoked by alias); 9 Nov 2011 15:57:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 29903 Received: (qmail 9203 invoked from network); 9 Nov 2011 15:57:35 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at closedmail.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) From: Bart Schaefer Message-id: <111109075700.ZM4753@torch.brasslantern.com> Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2011 07:57:00 -0800 In-reply-to: <877h39z9cb.fsf@ft.bewatermyfriend.org> Comments: In reply to Frank Terbeck "Re: PATCH: Update VCS_INFO_detect_svn for Subversion 1.7" (Nov 9, 2:58pm) References: <86sjlxoows.knu@iDaemons.org> <87boslzcic.fsf@ft.bewatermyfriend.org> <877h39z9cb.fsf@ft.bewatermyfriend.org> X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005) To: zsh-workers@zsh.org Subject: Re: PATCH: Update VCS_INFO_detect_svn for Subversion 1.7 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Nov 9, 2:58pm, Frank Terbeck wrote: } Subject: Re: PATCH: Update VCS_INFO_detect_svn for Subversion 1.7 } } How does it work? Well, the "(../)#.svn(/N)" pattern matches all .svn } sub-directories from the current directory up to the root directory `/'. I know it'd be a strange circumstance, but what happens if there is a /.svn directory? (Or /home/.svn, etc., somewhere above the user's personal tree.) Maybe qualify the glob with a U or G to check for user or at least group ownership of the .svn directory? Or would that break in some other way?