From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (euclid.skiles.gatech.edu [130.207.146.50]) by werple.net.au (8.7/8.7.1) with ESMTP id UAA15078 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 1996 20:46:58 +1100 (EST) Received: (from list@localhost) by euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) id EAA09625; Wed, 10 Jan 1996 04:21:43 -0500 (EST) Resent-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 1996 04:21:43 -0500 (EST) From: Zefram Message-Id: <11333.199601100921@stone.dcs.warwick.ac.uk> Subject: Re: Not a -M option To: P.Stephenson@swansea.ac.uk Date: Wed, 10 Jan 1996 09:21:21 +0000 (GMT) Cc: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu In-Reply-To: <5523.9601100858@pyro.swan.ac.uk> from "P.Stephenson@swansea.ac.uk" at Jan 10, 96 08:58:15 am X-Loop: zefram@dcs.warwick.ac.uk X-Stardate: [-31]6876.94 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"j_acE3.0.JM2.cKuym"@euclid> Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/731 X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu Peter wrote: >I'm pretty sure I sent a patch for this some time ago, something very >similar anyway. I'm not sure exactly what your patch did, but it didn't fix the bug I had reported (at least, not the way I was experiencing it). >If we're really expecting to produce a release in March, there are a >number of other purely bug-fix patches of mine I'd like to see rescued >from the black hole, otherwise the corresponding bugs are probably >never going to get fixed. I find myself thinking along similar lines. I've sent several bug fixes that haven't got into the baseline yet. And Zoltan's releases have an enormous number. I think the bugfix patches in Zoltan's release, particularly in the lexer, need to be integrated as a matter of urgency. -zefram