From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18841 invoked by alias); 23 Feb 2012 16:23:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 30263 Received: (qmail 29734 invoked from network); 23 Feb 2012 16:23:50 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at closedmail.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) From: Bart Schaefer Message-id: <120223082342.ZM11787@torch.brasslantern.com> Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 08:23:42 -0800 In-reply-to: <20120223105812.368d0eb9@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> Comments: In reply to Peter Stephenson "Re: let unset array element remove compatible with bash" (Feb 23, 10:58am) References: <120221210106.ZM13374@torch.brasslantern.com> <20120222095248.1ea8140b@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> <120222092827.ZM24425@torch.brasslantern.com> <20120223105812.368d0eb9@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005) To: Subject: Re: let unset array element remove compatible with bash MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Feb 23, 10:58am, Peter Stephenson wrote: } } I'm guessing there's no point waiting to get this into 4.3.17? No, I should think not. Also the first hunk of 30261 (suppressing WC_SUBLIST_NOT when errflag) makes me rather nervous, even though "make check" still passes. So I will leave it up to you to commit that if you feel it's safe to include in 4.3.17, and otherwise I'll commit it sometime after.