From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10410 invoked by alias); 17 Jul 2012 15:29:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 30572 Received: (qmail 17979 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2012 15:29:06 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at closedmail.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) From: Bart Schaefer Message-id: <120717082850.ZM5511@torch.brasslantern.com> Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 08:28:50 -0700 In-reply-to: <20120717093740.336e8d2d@pws-pc.ntlworld.com> Comments: In reply to Peter Stephenson "Re: zsh 4.3.17-test-2" (Jul 17, 9:37am) References: <20120715221202.6e46dcc6@pws-pc.ntlworld.com> <120716130904.ZM3641@torch.brasslantern.com> <20120717093740.336e8d2d@pws-pc.ntlworld.com> X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005) To: zsh-workers@zsh.org Subject: Re: zsh 4.3.17-test-2 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Jul 17, 9:37am, Peter Stephenson wrote: } Subject: Re: zsh 4.3.17-test-2 } } On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 13:09:04 -0700 } Bart Schaefer wrote: } > I found an uncommitted patch to compinit that we might want: } > zsh-users/17051 (explicitly set IFS before using "read"). } > } > Probably not critical. } } Thanks, guess that would be harmless to commit... Committed. Will you be creating a branch for 5.0.0 and moving the trunk to 5.1.0-dev (or some such), or are we going to proceed with all development on the "stable" branch now? Or something else entirely?