From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25204 invoked by alias); 11 Oct 2012 15:53:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 30725 Received: (qmail 26357 invoked from network); 11 Oct 2012 15:53:14 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at closedmail.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) From: Bart Schaefer Message-id: <121011085244.ZM31700@torch.brasslantern.com> Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 08:52:44 -0700 In-reply-to: Comments: In reply to Peter Stephenson "Re: Bug in ZSH 5.0.0 - Segmentation fault after sending process to background" (Oct 11, 3:35pm) References: <5076CDC9.9040908@googlemail.com> X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005) To: zsh-workers@zsh.org Subject: Re: Bug in ZSH 5.0.0 - Segmentation fault after sending process to background MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Oct 11, 3:35pm, Peter Stephenson wrote: } } I've added some tests to ensure thisjob is valid where necessary, and } also ensured that it's not valid for code called from execsimple(), } since it's never been set up --- or if it has we have no reason to } suppose it's a job we're interested in. Well, drat. I was hoping this had some bearing on the pipestatus bug (workers/29973) but it appears not.