From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29100 invoked by alias); 18 Oct 2012 15:08:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 30739 Received: (qmail 28530 invoked from network); 18 Oct 2012 15:08:19 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at closedmail.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) From: Bart Schaefer Message-id: <121018080751.ZM2795@torch.brasslantern.com> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 08:07:51 -0700 In-reply-to: <20121017211603.6189d6f4@pws-pc.ntlworld.com> Comments: In reply to Peter Stephenson "Re: Segfault in =( ) substitution" (Oct 17, 9:16pm) References: <20121017202030.46014a7a@pws-pc.ntlworld.com> <20121017211603.6189d6f4@pws-pc.ntlworld.com> X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005) To: zsh-workers@zsh.org Subject: Re: Segfault in =( ) substitution MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Oct 17, 9:16pm, Peter Stephenson wrote: : : I suppose it's worth pointing out you can now do things like this... : : () { : print File $1: : cat $1 : } =(print This be the verse) More than worth pointing out, it's worth putting in the docs as an example! Question is, whether it's better as an example of anonymous functions or of process substitution.