From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26056 invoked by alias); 19 Dec 2012 06:50:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 30917 Received: (qmail 3115 invoked from network); 19 Dec 2012 06:49:56 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at closedmail.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) From: Bart Schaefer Message-id: <121218224944.ZM28661@torch.brasslantern.com> Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 22:49:44 -0800 In-reply-to: <20121218203750.GA83380@redoubt.spodhuis.org> Comments: In reply to Phil Pennock "zsh.org & patch archive" (Dec 18, 3:37pm) References: <20121217085215.GA87227@redoubt.spodhuis.org> <20121217101536.6825d808@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> <20121218093337.GA11509@redoubt.spodhuis.org> <20121218203750.GA83380@redoubt.spodhuis.org> X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005) To: zsh-workers@zsh.org Subject: Re: zsh.org & patch archive MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Dec 18, 3:37pm, Phil Pennock wrote: } } So if it is supposed to still exist, who do we talk with or where do we } check out the integration tools, so that we can make sure the patch } archive picks up list mails with the git-format-patch subject prefix } variants ([PATCH] and [PATCH n/m])? This is reachable again: http://www.zsh.org/mla/patches.shtml It appears to pick up anything that looks like a diff, whether the word "PATCH" appears in the subject or not. E.g., the patch archive lists http://www.zsh.org/cgi-bin/mla/redirect?WORKERNUMBER=30840 } Is this Geoff? I believe so.