From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-30953-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 1887 invoked by alias); 7 Jan 2013 16:04:56 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 30953
Received: (qmail 9859 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2013 16:04:42 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at closedmail.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
Message-id: <130107080416.ZM3398@torch.brasslantern.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 08:04:16 -0800
In-reply-to: <20130107094740.66f559a9@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
Comments: In reply to Peter Stephenson <p.stephenson@samsung.com>
 "Re: read -q broken on OSX / BSD?" (Jan  7,  9:47am)
References:
 <CAPzVZKkeEr_oHVkv-mpudxCN=k=sP4PyvyCTofi3+JaP=fJafw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20130106184743.6325554b@pws-pc.ntlworld.com>
	<130106141307.ZM2510@torch.brasslantern.com>
	<20130107094740.66f559a9@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005)
To: zsh-workers@zsh.org
Subject: Re: read -q broken on OSX / BSD?
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On Jan 7,  9:47am, Peter Stephenson wrote:
}
} Now I look, if we're going to tinker like that, the zfree(buf, bptr -
} buf + 1) becomes a bit dodgy, too.

Is there really any case where the size passed to zfree matters?  IIRC
in the heap code we're passing only the size of the header structure,
not the size of the actual allocated block.