From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14376 invoked by alias); 13 Mar 2013 17:00:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 31149 Received: (qmail 5260 invoked from network); 13 Mar 2013 17:00:16 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at closedmail.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) From: Bart Schaefer Message-id: <130313095951.ZM17816@torch.brasslantern.com> Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 09:59:51 -0700 In-reply-to: <20130313093852.6ca67303@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> Comments: In reply to Peter Stephenson "Re: Number of psvar entries" (Mar 13, 9:38am) References: <20130313093852.6ca67303@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005) To: zsh workers Subject: Re: Number of psvar entries MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Mar 13, 9:38am, Peter Stephenson wrote: } } > % psvar[25]=hello; print -P %25v } > hello } > } > Am I missing something? } } Evidently the manual page is... That restriction certainly goes way } back to very early versions of zsh. I happen to have sitting around a binary of zsh 2.4.306 beta, and at that version the documentation is correct (and really strange stuff can happen if psvar[1,9] are all empty). By 3.0.5 indices above 9 are usable. So there's a chance the change is in CVS somewhere if that's interesting for some reason. } In which case the manual page simply needs updating. I'd say so.