From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29828 invoked by alias); 22 Apr 2013 06:59:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 31323 Received: (qmail 4758 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2013 06:59:43 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at closedmail.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) From: Bart Schaefer Message-id: <130421235936.ZM6922@torch.brasslantern.com> Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2013 23:59:36 -0700 In-reply-to: Comments: In reply to Felipe Contreras "Re: Alignment issue with multiple describes" (Apr 21, 3:59pm) References: <130420232740.ZM12405@torch.brasslantern.com> <130421112734.ZM6597@torch.brasslantern.com> X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005) To: Felipe Contreras Subject: Re: Alignment issue with multiple describes Cc: zsh-workers@zsh.org MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Apr 21, 3:59pm, Felipe Contreras wrote: } } Anyway, I'm going to label this as a bug the zsh developers are } unwilling to fix, and I'm going to work around it by avoiding more } than one _description with actual descriptions. Please don't consider anything I say as speaking for "the zsh developers" as a group. I'm just answering your questions. On the other hand, if you actually want to encourage someone to work on this for you, I think you're going about it the wrong way. } And BTW, the fact that you have part of the code nobody understands, } has touched, or is willing to touch in a decade should be a concern to } you. It is, in fact; but it's not something I'm really in a position to do anything about. I already give zsh as much time as I can (in fact more than I probably ought to), and thankfully most of the people I try to help out have a better attitude about it than you apparently do. Enjoy your day. If any further messages from you manage to spark useful discussion, you probably should not expect me to Cc you as a courtesy, because I have no evidence that I'll get any courtesy in return.