From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-31763-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 992 invoked by alias); 23 Sep 2013 04:57:16 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 31763
Received: (qmail 19698 invoked from network); 23 Sep 2013 04:57:10 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at closedmail.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
Message-id: <130922215731.ZM19104@torch.brasslantern.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2013 21:57:31 -0700
In-reply-to:
 <CANWLQWtsh6RTXSctg0hEyTxRHv7bngGeaOf6Cqxufm048br8iQ@mail.gmail.com>
Comments: In reply to Hauke Petersen <hkptrsn@gmail.com>
 "Re: zle: vi mode: wrong undo handling on fresh lines" (Sep 22, 10:27pm)
References:
 <CANWLQWsV5i+=3NptAxir6UYCoipFa2Pk+g6D1DDnMnJMVCbDgA@mail.gmail.com>
	<130922112421.ZM18920@torch.brasslantern.com>
	<CANWLQWtsh6RTXSctg0hEyTxRHv7bngGeaOf6Cqxufm048br8iQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005)
To: Hauke Petersen <hkptrsn@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: zle: vi mode: wrong undo handling on fresh lines
Cc: zsh-workers@zsh.org
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On Sep 22, 10:27pm, Hauke Petersen wrote:
}
} > "zle -K viins" means you're still in whatever "mode" you were
} > in before (emacs, vicmd, or viins), but have started using the keymap
} > normally used for viins mode.
} > "zle vi-insert" causes an actual change of mode
} 
} If there's an underlying difference, man zshzle(1) should probably say
} the following differently:
} 
}                      zle-line-init() { zle -K vicmd; }

Hmm, it probably would in fact be better to use "zle vi-cmd-mode" in
that example, but the differences between emacs mode and vicmd mode
are less extreme than emacs and viins.

} > Until the bug is fixed, try something like
} >
} >   zle-line-init() { [[ -o vi ]] && { zle vi-cmd-mode; zle vi-insert } }
} 
} Curiously:
} 
}     % EDITOR=vi zsh -f
}     % bindkey -lL main
}     bindkey -A viins main
}     % [[ -o vi ]] && echo yes

Heh.  Hence "try something like" not "do exactly this" ... what you use
in place of [[ -o vi ]] depends on how you got into viins mode in the
first place.  A more universal test would be [[ $KEYMAP == viins ]],
and now that I think of it vi-cmd-mode may move the cursor back one
postion, so:

    zle-line-init() {
      [[ $KEYMAP == viins ]] && {
	zle vi-cmd-mode
	zle vi-add-next
      }
    }